Honda CR-V 2010 vs Volvo XC60 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 53 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 108 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 8.5 | |
| Honda CR-V consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Volvo XC60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Honda CR-V has 4x4: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is identified (pressure is provided to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work seamlessly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 1 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda Accord | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo V60 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is smaller. Honda CR-V is 11 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 524 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda CR-V has 29 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`080 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo XC60 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |