Honda CR-V 2010 vs Toyota RAV4 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 NM | 198 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 8 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2010: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is identified (pressure is provided to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work seamlessly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. Toyota RAV4 2010: It has proactive automatic all-wheel drive and acts as front-wheel drive under normal conditions. In the event of wheel slip, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. The clutch can also be locked manually using a button on the console. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda Accord | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Lexus NX, Toyota C-HR | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is larger, but lower. Honda CR-V is 16 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda CR-V is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 524 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1752 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Honda CR-V has 62 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Honda CR-V uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.8 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`080 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Toyota RAV4 has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |