Honda CR-V 2010 vs Nissan X-Trail 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 169 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 NM | 233 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V engine produces 19 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 41 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 9.6 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2010: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is identified (pressure is provided to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work seamlessly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. Nissan X-Trail 2010: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 24 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda Accord | Used also on Nissan Sentra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 11 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 524 litres | 479 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda CR-V has 45 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 1 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`050 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |