Honda CR-V 2004 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 176 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 4 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 164 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 9.1 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Honda CR-V has 4x4: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Outlander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 44 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mitsubishi Outlander engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Honda CR-V is larger. Honda CR-V is 10 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 3 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | 1691 litres | |
| Honda CR-V has 123 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 739 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |