Honda CR-V 2004 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V 2004 and Honda CR-V 2007 have the same engine power, but Honda CR-V 2004 torque is 2 NM less than Honda CR-V 2007. Honda CR-V 2004 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V 2007 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V 2004 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V 2007, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V 2004 could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V 2004 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V 2007. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 540 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V 2007 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2004: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. Honda CR-V 2007: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | Used also on Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
| Honda CR-V 2004 is 12 cm longer than the Honda CR-V 2007, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V 2004 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | 955 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V 2007 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Honda CR-V 2004 has 31 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V 2007. This could mean that the Honda CR-V 2004 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V 2007 (by 3 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V 2004 is 1.4 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V 2007, which means Honda CR-V 2004 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 5600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |