Honda CR-V 2004 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 183 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is more dynamic to drive. Honda CR-V engine produces 10 HP more power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 7 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Thanks to more power Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 12.1 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 540 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
| Suzuki Grand Vitara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | Used also on Suzuki SX4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 17 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 398 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | 1951 litres | |
| Honda CR-V has 127 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Grand Vitara (by 999 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.6 metres less than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Honda CR-V, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |