Honda CR-V 2002 vs Toyota RAV4 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4 have the same engine power, but Honda CR-V torque is 2 NM less than Toyota RAV4. Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 8.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 9.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda CR-V consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2002: Car has Honda`s real-time four-wheel drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. Multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to clutch by dual pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. Toyota RAV4 2003: Toyota has full-time all wheel drive with viscous coupling locking center differential and can have optional Torsen limited-slip rear differential. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | Used also on Toyota Avensis Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.72 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 32 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda CR-V is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | 1150 litres | |
| Honda CR-V has 125 litres more trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 198 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 1`825 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |