Honda CR-V 2002 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V 2002 and Honda CR-V 2004 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Honda CR-V 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 9.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Honda CR-V 2002 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V 2004, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V 2002 could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda CR-V 2002 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V 2004. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 640 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2002: Car has Honda`s real-time four-wheel drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. Multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to clutch by dual pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. Honda CR-V 2004: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V 2002 is 6 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V 2004, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | 952 litres | |
| Honda CR-V 2002 has 2 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V 2004. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
| |