Honda CR-V 2002 vs Hyundai Tucson 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 184 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is more dynamic to drive. Honda CR-V engine produces 9 HP more power than Hyundai Tucson, whereas torque is 6 NM more than Hyundai Tucson. Thanks to more power Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.5 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 135 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda CR-V consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 400'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Sonata, Hyundai Elantra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Tucson might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.73 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 26 cm longer than the Hyundai Tucson, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 644 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai Tucson has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Honda CR-V has 119 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Tucson. This could mean that the Honda CR-V uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.4 metres less than that of the Hyundai Tucson, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Hyundai Tucson has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Honda CR-V, so Hyundai Tucson quality could be a bit better. | ||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |