Honda CR-V 2002 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is more dynamic to drive. Honda CR-V engine produces 10 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 2 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 10.0 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 740 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2002: Car has Honda`s real-time four-wheel drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. Multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to clutch by dual pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. Nissan X-Trail 2003: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Primera, Nissan Serena, Nissan Sentra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V is 7 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 525 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | no data | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Honda CR-V has 115 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
| |