Honda CR-V 2001 vs Honda CR-V 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 182 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V 2002 is a more dynamic driving. Honda CR-V 2001 engine produces 3 HP less power than Honda CR-V 2002, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Honda CR-V 2002. Due to the lower power, Honda CR-V 2001 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 11.1 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V 2001 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Honda CR-V 2001 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V 2002, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V 2001 could require 90 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Honda CR-V 2001 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V 2002. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 560 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 1997: Car has Honda`s real-time four-wheel drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. Multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to clutch by dual pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. Honda CR-V 2002: Car has Honda`s real-time four-wheel drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. Multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to clutch by dual pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V 2001 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda Accord | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V 2002 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V 2001 is 5 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V 2002, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V 2001 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 374 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
670 litres | 952 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V 2002 has more luggage space. Honda CR-V 2001 has 151 litres less trunk space than the Honda CR-V 2002. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V 2002 (by 282 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V 2001 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V 2002. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |