Honda CR-V 2017 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is more dynamic to drive. Honda CR-V engine produces 30 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.3 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1080 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2017: Vehicle features automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under typical conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear wheels when slipping is detected. Nissan X-Trail 2017: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Nissan X-Trail engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 10 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 3 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 497 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1110 litres | 1877 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Honda CR-V has 53 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 767 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`320 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 22 000 | 21 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |