Honda CR-V 2015 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is more dynamic to drive. Honda CR-V engine produces 30 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| 820 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Honda CR-V has 4x4: Vehicle features automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under typical conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear wheels when slipping is detected. The all-wheel drive system constantly communicates with the VSA dynamic stabilization system and the electric power steering to maintain full control of the vehicle, good traction and maneuverability in any road conditions. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2014 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Nissan X-Trail engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 2.10 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.71 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 4 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 28 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1669 litres | 1877 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Honda CR-V has 39 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 208 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`310 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |