Honda CR-V 2004 vs Subaru Forester 2005

 
Honda CR-V
2004 - 2006
Subaru Forester
2005 - 2008
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.4 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 162 HP230 HP
Torque: 220 NM320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds6 seconds
Honda CR-V engine produces 68 HP less power than Subaru Forester, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Subaru Forester.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.110.7
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Honda CR-V consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that by driving the Honda CR-V over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 58 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 570 km in combined cycle560 km in combined cycle

Drive type

Wheel drive type: 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.54 m4.48 m
Width: 1.78 m1.74 m
Height: 1.71 m1.58 m
Honda CR-V is larger.
Honda CR-V is 6 cm longer than the Subaru Forester, 4 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 13 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 525 litres387 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
952 litresno data
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity.
Honda CR-V has 138 litres more trunk space than the Subaru Forester.
Turning diameter: no data10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`9102`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

high
Subaru Forester has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Subaru Forester, so Subaru Forester quality is probably better
Average price (€): 32003600
Rating in user reviews: 8.4/10 9.2/10
Pros and Cons: Honda CR-V has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Subaru Forester has
  • more power
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv