Honda CR-V 2017 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 NM | 222 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 17 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 23 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.7 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda CR-V consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 198 mm (7.8 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Outlander can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 11 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 497 litres | 477 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1110 litres | 1640 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Honda CR-V has 20 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The Mitsubishi Outlander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 530 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`210 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 22 000 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |