Honda CR-V 2017 vs Toyota RAV4 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 146 HP | |
| Torque: | 243 NM | 187 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 44 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 56 NM more than Toyota RAV4. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2017: Vehicle features automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under typical conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear wheels when slipping is detected. Toyota RAV4 2015: It has proactive automatic four-wheel drive with Auto, Lock and Sport modes. In Auto mode, the car has front-wheel drive under normal conditions. If wheel slip is detected, torque is transferred to the rear wheels via an electronically controlled multi-plate clutch. In Sport mode, torque is transferred almost instantly between the front and rear wheels to enhance cornering performance by sending up to 50 percent of engine power to the rear wheels. Lock mode can be activated when driving below 40 km/h (25 mph) and provides constant four-wheel drive. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Camry | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.72 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda CR-V is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda CR-V is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 497 litres | 577 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1110 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Honda CR-V has 80 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda CR-V has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 22 000 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |