Honda CR-V 2017 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 243 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V engine produces 27 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
|
Honda CR-V has 4x4: Vehicle features automatic four-wheel drive system that sends torque to front wheels under typical conditions. Electronically controlled multi-plate clutch transfers torque to rear wheels when slipping is detected. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 208 mm (8.2 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.71 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 10 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 3 cm wider, while the height of Honda CR-V is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 497 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1110 litres | 1877 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Honda CR-V has 53 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 767 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`210 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 22 000 | 21 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |