Honda CR-V 2015 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 188 HP | 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 245 NM | 222 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is more dynamic to drive. Honda CR-V engine produces 21 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 23 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Outlander can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 12 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | 477 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1669 litres | 1640 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda CR-V has 112 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The Mitsubishi Outlander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 29 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 1.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`210 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 16 200 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |