Honda CR-V 2015 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
| Honda CR-V and Mitsubishi Outlander have the same engine power, but Honda CR-V torque is 5 NM less than Mitsubishi Outlander. Honda CR-V reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Honda CR-V consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda CR-V could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda CR-V consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Outlander can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi Outlander version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from eight 4x4 versions of Mitsubishi Outlander 2015 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda CR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda Accord | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 9 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 589 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1669 litres | 1754 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Honda CR-V has 39 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The Mitsubishi Outlander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Outlander (by 85 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 1.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Outlander has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 600 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |