Honda CR-V 2017 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 - 190 HP | 121 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 350 NM | 190 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 11.9 seconds | 8.7 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 8.7 | 1.7 - 10.6 | |
|
Honda CR-V petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Outlander. On average, Honda CR-V equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 155 - 208 mm (6.1 - 8.2 inches) | 190 - 216 mm (7.5 - 8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Outlander can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.68 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 11 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1110 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2146 litres | 1792 litres | |
|
Honda CR-V has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Honda CR-V has 560 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The Mitsubishi Outlander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda CR-V (by 354 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Honda CR-V can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`208 | ~ 2`182 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 22 000 | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |