Honda CR-V 2004 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Honda CR-V is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Suzuki Grand Vitara can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Suzuki Grand Vitara also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 | 1.9 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 162 HP | 129 - 229 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 340 NM | 183 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 - 12 seconds | 9 - 13.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 10.1 | 7.7 - 11.3 | |
|
Honda CR-V petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Grand Vitara. On average, Honda CR-V equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.70 m | |
| Honda CR-V is 14 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Honda CR-V is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 527 litres | 691 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
952 litres | 1951 litres | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Honda CR-V has 164 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. This could mean that the Honda CR-V uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Grand Vitara (by 999 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda CR-V is 0.4 metres less than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Honda CR-V can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`910 | ~ 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda CR-V has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |