Honda Accord 2012 vs Honda CR-V 2010
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 166 HP | |
| Torque: | 228 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Honda Accord is more dynamic to drive. Honda Accord engine produces 14 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Honda Accord reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 9.5 | |
|
The Honda Accord is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda Accord consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that by driving the Honda Accord over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1040 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Honda Accord gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2010: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is identified (pressure is provided to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work seamlessly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.89 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Honda Accord is larger, but lower. Honda Accord is 32 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 3 cm wider, while the height of Honda Accord is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 447 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Accord has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Accord has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |