Honda Accord 2011 vs Mazda 6 2012

 
Honda Accord
2011 - 2012
Mazda 6
2012 - 2015
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.4 Petrol2.5 Petrol

Performance

Power: 201 HP192 HP
Torque: 234 NM256 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8 seconds7.8 seconds
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving.
Honda Accord engine produces 9 HP more power than Mazda 6, but torque is 22 NM less than Mazda 6. Despite the higher power, Honda Accord reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.66.3
Real fuel consumption: 9.3 l/100km8.0 l/100km
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Honda Accord consumes 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Accord could require 345 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Honda Accord consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle980 km in combined cycle
940 km on highway1240 km on highway
690 km with real consumption770 km with real consumption
Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.73 m4.87 m
Width: 1.84 m1.84 m
Height: 1.44 m1.45 m
Honda Accord is 15 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda Accord is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 464 litres489 litres
Mazda 6 has more luggage space.
Honda Accord has 25 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6.
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Honda Accord is 1.5 metres more than that of the Mazda 6, which means Honda Accord can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`995no data
Safety: no data
Quality:Mazda 6 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Honda Accord has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 68006600
Pros and Cons:
    Mazda 6 has
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • roomier boot
    • better manoeuvrability
    • fewer faults
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv