Honda Accord 2011 vs Mazda 6 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving. Honda Accord engine produces 25 HP less power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Mazda 6. Due to the lower power, Honda Accord reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 4.8 | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda Accord consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Accord could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1290 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1470 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
| Honda Accord is 15 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda Accord is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 467 litres | 489 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage space. Honda Accord has 22 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Accord is 1.5 metres more than that of the Mazda 6, which means Honda Accord can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`110 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Mazda 6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Accord has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 6 has
| |