Honda Accord 2003 vs Honda Accord 2003

 
Honda Accord
2003 - 2005
Honda Accord
2003 - 2005
Body: Estate car / wagonSedan
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.2 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 140 HP140 HP
Torque: 340 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.3 seconds9.4 seconds
Honda Accord 2003 and Honda Accord 2003 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Honda Accord 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.85.4
Real fuel consumption: 6.6 l/100km6.6 l/100km
The Honda Accord 2003 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Honda Accord 2003 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord 2003, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Accord 2003 could require 60 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1120 km in combined cycle1200 km in combined cycle
1350 km on highway1410 km on highway
980 km with real consumption980 km with real consumption
Honda Accord 2003 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 8 years8 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.75 m4.66 m
Width: 1.76 m1.76 m
Height: 1.47 m1.44 m
Honda Accord 2003 is 9 cm longer than the Honda Accord 2003, width is practically the same , while the height of Honda Accord 2003 is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 576 litres459 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1657 litresno data
Honda Accord 2003 has more luggage capacity.
Honda Accord 2003 has 117 litres more trunk space than the Honda Accord 2003.
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters11.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety:
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 16002000
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 8.0/10
Pros and Cons: Honda Accord has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Honda Accord has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv