Honda Accord 1995 vs Toyota Carina E 1994
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 184 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Toyota Carina E is a more dynamic driving. Honda Accord engine produces 39 HP less power than Toyota Carina E, whereas torque is 2 NM less than Toyota Carina E. Due to the lower power, Honda Accord reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.0 | 7.8 | |
|
The Toyota Carina E is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda Accord consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Accord could require 180 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| Toyota Carina E gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Honda CR-V | Used also on Toyota Celica | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Carina E might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Honda Accord is larger. Honda Accord is 24 cm longer than the Toyota Carina E, 8 cm wider, while the height of Honda Accord is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
739 litres | 1250 litres | |
|
Toyota Carina E has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Honda Accord has 40 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Carina E. This could mean that the Honda Accord uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota Carina E (by 511 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Accord is 0.3 metres more than that of the Toyota Carina E. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | 1`700 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Toyota Carina E has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Honda Accord has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Toyota Carina E, so Toyota Carina E quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Carina E has
| |