Honda Accord 2012 vs Volvo S80 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 188 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 247 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
| Honda Accord engine produces 52 HP more power than Volvo S80, but torque is 103 NM less than Volvo S80. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 4.9 | |
|
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Honda Accord consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Honda Accord could require 480 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 1420 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1620 km on highway | ||
| Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.86 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Honda Accord is 1 cm longer than the Volvo S80, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Honda Accord is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 447 litres | 480 litres | |
|
Volvo S80 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Honda Accord has 33 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S80. This could mean that the Honda Accord uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8600 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Accord has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |