Honda Accord 2011 vs Mazda 6 2010

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Honda Accord
2011 - 2012
Mazda 6
2010 - 2012
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.0 - 2.41.8 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 150 - 201 HP120 - 180 HP
Torque: 192 - 380 NM165 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.3 - 10.5 seconds8.4 - 11.8 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.5 - 8.75.2 - 8.1
Honda Accord petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 6. On average, Honda Accord equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.75 m4.79 m
Width: 1.84 m1.80 m
Height: 1.47 m1.49 m
Honda Accord is 4 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 5 cm wider, while the height of Honda Accord is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 406 litres519 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1183 litres1751 litres
Mazda 6 has more luggage space.
Honda Accord has 113 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 568 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Honda Accord is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda 6.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`078~ 2`061
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 68004200
Pros and Cons:
    Mazda 6 has
    • lower fuel consumption
    • roomier boot
    • fewer faults
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv