Honda Accord 2003 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.4 (petrol, diesel) | 1.3 - 2.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 140 - 190 HP | 82 - 135 HP | |
Torque: | 190 - 340 NM | 120 - 176 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 - 11.5 seconds | 9.7 - 13.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 10.0 | 6.5 - 8.4 | |
Honda Accord petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Lancer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.75 m | 4.48 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
Honda Accord is larger. Honda Accord is 27 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 7 cm wider, while the height of Honda Accord is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 576 litres | 430 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1657 litres | no data | |
Honda Accord has more luggage capacity. Honda Accord has 146 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Lancer. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`050 | ~ 1`750 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 8.7/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Honda Accord has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |