Honda Accord 1999 vs Mazda 626 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.3 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 154 HP | 100 - 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 - 210 NM | 152 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 13.5 seconds | 9.6 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 9.2 | 5.9 - 8.9 | |
|
Honda Accord petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 626. On average, Honda Accord equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Honda Accord is larger. Honda Accord is 1 cm longer than the Mazda 626, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 502 litres | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Honda Accord has 52 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626. This could mean that the Honda Accord uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Accord is 1 metres more than that of the Mazda 626, which means Honda Accord can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`914 | ~ 1`671 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Accord has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |