Honda Accord 1999 vs Toyota Carina E 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.3 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 154 HP | 73 - 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 - 210 NM | 132 - 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 13.5 seconds | 8.4 - 16.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 9.2 | 5.8 - 8.5 | |
|
Honda Accord petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Carina E. On average, Honda Accord equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Honda Accord is larger. Honda Accord is 7 cm longer than the Toyota Carina E, 5 cm wider, while the height of Honda Accord is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1250 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Honda Accord has 20 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Carina E. This could mean that the Honda Accord uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Accord is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota Carina E, which means Honda Accord can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`914 | ~ 1`684 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Accord has
|
Toyota Carina E has
| |