Honda Accord 1999 vs Mitsubishi Lancer 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.3 (petrol, diesel) | 1.3 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 105 - 154 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 - 210 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 13.5 seconds | 12.5 - 15.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 - 9.2 | 6.9 - 8.0 | |
|
Honda Accord petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Lancer. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.60 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Honda Accord is larger. Honda Accord is 30 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Lancer, 6 cm wider, while the height of Honda Accord is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Honda Accord is 1.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Lancer, which means Honda Accord can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`914 | ~ 1`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Honda Accord has
|
Mitsubishi Lancer has
| |