Ford Scorpio 1994 vs Volvo V90 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 207 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 281 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Ford Scorpio is more dynamic to drive. Ford Scorpio engine produces 27 HP more power than Volvo V90, whereas torque is 21 NM more than Volvo V90. Thanks to more power Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.8 | 11.7 | |
|
The Volvo V90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Scorpio consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Scorpio could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Volvo V90 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
| Ford Scorpio is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo V90, 12 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1702 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.7 metres more than that of the Volvo V90, which means Ford Scorpio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Volvo V90 has
| |