Ford Scorpio 1994 vs Volvo V90 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo V90 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Scorpio engine produces 64 HP less power than Volvo V90, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 11.0 | |
|
The Ford Scorpio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Scorpio consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90, which means that by driving the Ford Scorpio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Ford Scorpio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.45 m | |
| Ford Scorpio is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo V90, 12 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 602 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1702 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.7 metres more than that of the Volvo V90, which means Ford Scorpio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`685 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Volvo V90 has
| |