Ford Scorpio 1994 vs Volvo 940 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Volvo 940 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Scorpio engine produces 6 HP less power than Volvo 940, but torque is 20 NM more than Volvo 940. Due to the lower power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.0 | |
|
The Volvo 940 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Scorpio consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 940, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Scorpio could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| Volvo 940 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Ford Scorpio is larger. Ford Scorpio is 2 cm longer than the Volvo 940, 12 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 992 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2125 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo 940, which means Ford Scorpio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`685 | 1`945 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Volvo 940 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Scorpio has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Volvo 940, so Volvo 940 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Volvo 940 has
| |