Ford Scorpio 1992 vs Seat Toledo 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 201 NM | 166 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Seat Toledo is a more dynamic driving. Ford Scorpio engine produces 24 HP less power than Seat Toledo, but torque is 35 NM more than Seat Toledo. Due to the lower power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.2 | |
|
The Ford Scorpio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Scorpio consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that by driving the Ford Scorpio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Scorpio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Seat Toledo) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Scorpio) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Ford Scorpio is larger. Ford Scorpio is 35 cm longer than the Seat Toledo, 10 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.1 metres less than that of the Seat Toledo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Ford Scorpio has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Toledo has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Ford Scorpio, so Ford Scorpio quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | no data | 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Seat Toledo has
| |