Ford Scorpio 1992 vs Volvo 960 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 171 NM | 267 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Volvo 960 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Scorpio engine produces 84 HP less power than Volvo 960, whereas torque is 96 NM less than Volvo 960. Due to the lower power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 11.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 12.4 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Scorpio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Scorpio consumes 3.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960, which means that by driving the Ford Scorpio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 480 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Scorpio consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Scorpio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.74 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.41 m | |
| Ford Scorpio is 13 cm shorter than the Volvo 960, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 491 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo 960, which means Ford Scorpio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`750 | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Volvo 960 has
| |