Ford Scorpio 1995 vs Opel Omega 1994
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 229 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Opel Omega is a more dynamic driving. Ford Scorpio engine produces 61 HP less power than Opel Omega, whereas torque is 41 NM less than Opel Omega. Due to the lower power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.1 | 9.7 | |
|
The Opel Omega is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Scorpio consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Omega, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Scorpio could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| Opel Omega gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Ford Scorpio is larger, but lower. Ford Scorpio is 3 cm longer than the Opel Omega, 9 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 830 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.6 metres less than that of the Opel Omega, which means Ford Scorpio can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Ford Scorpio has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Opel Omega, so Ford Scorpio quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Opel Omega has
| |