Ford Scorpio 1994 vs Volvo S90 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Volvo S90 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Scorpio engine produces 64 HP less power than Volvo S90, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Ford Scorpio reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 11.0 | |
|
The Ford Scorpio is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Scorpio consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S90, which means that by driving the Ford Scorpio over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Ford Scorpio gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.42 m | |
| Ford Scorpio is 5 cm shorter than the Volvo S90, 13 cm wider, while the height of Ford Scorpio is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Scorpio is 0.7 metres more than that of the Volvo S90, which means Ford Scorpio can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`770 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Scorpio has
|
Volvo S90 has
| |