Ford Mondeo 2007 vs Mazda 6 2008

 
Ford Mondeo
2007 - 2010
Mazda 6
2008 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.2 Diesel

Performance

Power: 175 HP185 HP
Torque: 400 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.7 seconds8.5 seconds
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving.
Ford Mondeo engine produces 10 HP less power than Mazda 6, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.25.6
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford Mondeo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 90 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1120 km in combined cycle1140 km in combined cycle
1420 km on highway1360 km on highway
Ground clearance: 110 mm (4.3 inches)165 mm (6.5 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.78 m4.76 m
Width: 1.89 m1.80 m
Height: 1.50 m1.44 m
Ford Mondeo is larger.
Ford Mondeo is 3 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 10 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 486 litres510 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1460 litres1702 litres
Mazda 6 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Ford Mondeo has 24 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. This could mean that the Ford Mondeo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 242 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`1702`110
Safety:
Quality:
below average

above average
Mazda 6 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 30003200
Pros and Cons: Ford Mondeo has
  • lower price
Mazda 6 has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ground clearance
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv