Ford Mondeo 1996 vs Ford Mondeo 1996

 
Ford Mondeo
1996 - 1998
Ford Mondeo
1996 - 1998
Body: Estate car / wagonHatchback
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 116 HP116 HP
Torque: 158 NM158 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.9 seconds13.4 seconds
Ford Mondeo 1996 and Ford Mondeo 1996 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Ford Mondeo 1996 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.48.8
Real fuel consumption: 10.5 l/100km10.5 l/100km
The Ford Mondeo 1996 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Mondeo 1996 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo 1996, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo 1996 could require 90 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
840 km on highway920 km on highway
590 km with real consumption590 km with real consumption
Ford Mondeo 1996 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.56 m
Width: 1.75 m1.75 m
Height: 1.39 m1.37 m
Ford Mondeo 1996 is 11 cm longer than the Ford Mondeo 1996, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Mondeo 1996 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 540 litres460 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1610 litres1290 litres
Ford Mondeo 1996 has more luggage capacity.
Ford Mondeo 1996 has 80 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mondeo 1996. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo 1996 (by 320 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10.3 meters
Gross weight (kg): no datano data
Safety:
Quality:
low

low
Average price (€): 600600
Rating in user reviews: 8.3/10 8.3/10
Pros and Cons: Ford Mondeo has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Ford Mondeo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv