Ford Mondeo 2007 vs Volvo V70 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 161 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 208 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo V70 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo engine produces 39 HP less power than Volvo V70, whereas torque is 92 NM less than Volvo V70. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Mondeo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 680 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.54 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mondeo is 1 cm longer than the Volvo V70, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 554 litres | 575 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1745 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo V70 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Mondeo has 21 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70. This could mean that the Ford Mondeo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo V70. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`165 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Volvo V70 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Volvo V70, so Volvo V70 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 5200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.3/10 | 8.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Volvo V70 has
| |