Ford Mondeo 2003 vs Fiat Croma 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
| Ford Mondeo engine produces 5 HP less power than Fiat Croma, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Croma, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Mondeo consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Croma. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1240 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
| 860 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.60 m | |
| Ford Mondeo is 3 cm shorter than the Fiat Croma, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 17 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Fiat Croma. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
| |