Ford Mondeo 2007 vs Renault Laguna 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 125 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is more dynamic to drive. Ford Mondeo engine produces 15 HP more power than Renault Laguna, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Renault Laguna. Thanks to more power Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 1400 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1650 km on highway | ||
| 1090 km with real consumption | 1130 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo is larger. Ford Mondeo is 9 cm longer than the Renault Laguna, 8 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1448 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity. Ford Mondeo has 90 litres more trunk space than the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Laguna, which means Ford Mondeo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`155 | 1`936 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Renault Laguna has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Mondeo, so Renault Laguna quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |