Ford Mondeo 2014 vs Mazda 3 2013

 
Ford Mondeo
2014 - 2018
Mazda 3
2013 - 2016
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP150 HP
Torque: 350 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.9 seconds9 seconds
Ford Mondeo and Mazda 3 have the same engine power, but Ford Mondeo torque is 140 NM more than Mazda 3. Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.86.2
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford Mondeo consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1310 km in combined cycle820 km in combined cycle
1430 km on highway860 km on highway
Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Ground clearance: 128 mm (5 inches)155 mm (6.1 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 3 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 3 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.87 m4.47 m
Width: 1.85 m1.80 m
Height: 1.48 m1.45 m
Ford Mondeo is larger.
Ford Mondeo is 41 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 6 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 458 litres364 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1356 litres1263 litres
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity.
Ford Mondeo has 94 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 93 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 1 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Ford Mondeo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`2701`835
Safety:
Mazda 3 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda 3 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality:
below average

average
Mazda 3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 10 0007200
Pros and Cons: Ford Mondeo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • more dynamic
  • higher ground clearance
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher safety
  • better safety assist technologies
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv