Ford Mondeo 2003 vs Opel Vectra 2002

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Ford Mondeo
2003 - 2005
Opel Vectra
2002 - 2005
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 3.01.8 - 3.2

Performance

Power: 90 - 226 HP120 - 211 HP
Torque: 165 - 360 NM167 - 370 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.4 - 12.8 seconds7.5 - 12 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.7 - 10.75.7 - 10.0
Ford Mondeo petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Vectra. On average, a Ford Mondeo with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Opel Vectra.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.73 m4.60 m
Width: 1.81 m1.80 m
Height: 1.43 m1.46 m
Ford Mondeo is larger, but slightly lower.
Ford Mondeo is 13 cm longer than the Opel Vectra, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 500 litres500 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1360 litres
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Opel Vectra.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`949~ 1`998
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

below average
Average price (€): 12001200
Rating in user reviews: 7.5/10 7.7/10
Pros and Cons: Ford Mondeo has
  • fewer faults
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv