Ford Mondeo 1996 vs Ford Mondeo 1996

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Ford Mondeo
1996 - 2000
Ford Mondeo
1996 - 2000
Body: Estate car / wagonHatchback
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 2.51.6 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 90 - 205 HP90 - 205 HP
Torque: 138 - 235 NM138 - 235 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8 - 13.9 seconds7.9 - 13.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.7 - 10.36.3 - 10.1
Ford Mondeo 1996 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Mondeo 1996. On average, Ford Mondeo 1996 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo 1996.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.56 m
Width: 1.75 m1.75 m
Height: 1.39 m1.37 m
Ford Mondeo 1996 is 11 cm longer than the Ford Mondeo 1996, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Mondeo 1996 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 540 litres460 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1610 litres1290 litres
Ford Mondeo 1996 has more luggage capacity.
Ford Mondeo 1996 has 80 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mondeo 1996. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo 1996 (by 320 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10.3 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`953~ 1`829
Safety:
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): 600600
Rating in user reviews: 8.3/10 8.3/10
Pros and Cons: Ford Mondeo has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Ford Mondeo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv