Ford Mondeo 2010 vs Mazda 6 2010

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Ford Mondeo
2010 - 2014
Mazda 6
2010 - 2012
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 2.21.8 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 115 - 240 HP120 - 180 HP
Torque: 159 - 420 NM165 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.5 - 12.3 seconds8.4 - 11.7 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.3 - 7.95.2 - 8.0
Ford Mondeo petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 6. On average, Ford Mondeo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.78 m4.76 m
Width: 1.89 m1.80 m
Height: 1.50 m1.44 m
Ford Mondeo is larger.
Ford Mondeo is 2 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 9 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 486 litres510 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1390 litres1702 litres
Mazda 6 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Ford Mondeo has 24 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6. This could mean that the Ford Mondeo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 312 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means Ford Mondeo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`173~ 2`021
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

above average
Average price (€): 52004200
Pros and Cons:
    Mazda 6 has
    • lower fuel consumption
    • fewer faults
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv