Ford Galaxy 1995 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1992

 
Ford Galaxy
1995 - 2000
Mitsubishi Space Wagon
1992 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 90 HP82 HP
Torque: 202 NM172 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 17.1 seconds17.8 seconds
Ford Galaxy is more dynamic to drive.
Ford Galaxy engine produces 8 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. Thanks to more power Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.58.1
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford Galaxy consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that by driving the Ford Galaxy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1150 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.62 m4.50 m
Width: 1.80 m1.70 m
Height: 1.73 m1.58 m
Ford Galaxy is larger.
Ford Galaxy is 12 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 10 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 15 cm higher.
Seats: no data7 seats
Trunk capacity: no data212 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data212 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1714 litres
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0001`900
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

above average
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, so Mitsubishi Space Wagon quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 800800
Rating in user reviews: 8.3/10 7.5/10
Pros and Cons: Ford Galaxy has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv