Ford Galaxy 1995 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1995
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 172 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.1 seconds | 17.8 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is more dynamic to drive. Ford Galaxy engine produces 8 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Runner, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Runner. Thanks to more power Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 8.1 | |
|
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Galaxy consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means that by driving the Ford Galaxy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 1410 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is larger. Ford Galaxy is 35 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, 10 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 676 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1498 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means Ford Galaxy can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 6.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
| |